Saturday, July 22, 2006

Superman Returns

One wishes he had not. Despite whatever the collection register says, this movie should have been called "Sissy Returns"

Haven't seen a more 'soft' superhero movie in recent times. I mean a superhero is supposed to perform some feats of some incredible prowess. Dazzle, Leave you breathless. This one leaves you yawning.

Thoroughly boring and undeserving of the ticket money. There is greater attention to Lois Lane than to Superman. And the special effects are worthy of some B-Grade 1970s flick when they didn't have the time to manipulate frames to the nth degree and jazz it up. The 3-D effects are forgettable. In fact, the first time we are supposed to wear those glasses, the picture was so shaky that it was almost better without the glasses.

And why do we have to watch something which sounds so much like a soap about someone who wrote an article on why we don't need superman and the husband and the asthmatic kid, ...

Just how many constituencies were addressed by this load of mule-s@#$%?

Maybe, the scriptwriters should have plugged "Why Superman should not have returned?"

I guess the good looking Brando Routh's tantrums written about elsewhere were perhaps a fallout of the angst of being the Returning Superman.

The flick almost sounds like those things which are returned by dissatisfied customers...

Please avoid. And someone, please return my money

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home